Skip to main content

Dealing with finite resources (such as oil) has its drawbacks.

We live in a world where demand for oil is forecasted to increase, with India and China among the noteworthy leaders. Also worth noting: As oil-exporting nations (think Middle East) modernize their own economies and cater to the increasing demands of citizens eager to embrace the lifestyle of Americans, their own energy demands increase.

Their oil; their decisions about keeping or selling. There are no guarantees that the pipelines remain plugged in to feed the American lifestyle at the expense of their own nations.

Those finite resources we depend upon refuse to behave as if they are not finite, so their rates of production continue to slow (assuming they can first be technologically—and then profitably—extracted). The conventional crude oil fields which mankind has relied upon to power its modern lifestyles and industries for well over a century continue to deplete—at least 3-4 million barrels per day depending on which source is referenced.

Despite all the hype about increased production from shale formations here in the United States (a fact not in dispute by those of us concerned about peak oil production), the part of that story omitted in all the Happy Talk hype is that a prime characteristic of deep-water fields (with all of their inherent extraction challenges, being in deep water and all) and those tight oil wells is that they have very rapid decline rates. You get a lot at the start, and then … not so much after that.

The solution: drill more wells. The problem: that’s very expensive, for one thing. The other important factor is that the good stuff gets tapped first, so the Plan B drilling efforts are occurring in places where it’s even more expensive to find the stuff that’s harder to find and extract to begin with. Those facts wreak havoc with the Happy Talk of energy abundance and the we’re-this-close-to-energy-independence story the oil industry and its paid cheerleaders continue to pump out.

So while no one argues that we’re running out of oil (other than those cheerleaders who keep raising this phony straw man argument to lend credence to their cheerleading efforts), what we’re confronted with from this point forward is an ever-diminishing supply of the energy supply which has powered and sustained us for more decades. The Plan B options have short-term benefits and enjoy a level of optimistic notoriety now, but what’s available now is not the long-term answer.

Production doesn’t exactly provide supply in a week or two, either. Start to finish time is measured over a period of several years. Stuff happens in between start and end, so it’s not a guaranteed, effort- and challenge-free process. For instance:

Capex compression is a term we use to describe the reduction of upstream spending by the oil companies when their exploration and production costs are rising faster than their oil revenues. That’s what’s happening today. Hess is divesting oil producing properties to increase profits; BP has shelved the deepwater Mad Dog Phase 2 project in the Gulf of Mexico. This is occurring because oil prices haven’t been increasing, and costs have. So oil companies are looking at their portfolio of projects and deciding to postpone or cancel some of them. Were the oil supply rising quickly and oil prices falling, this sort of capital restraint would be normal—the usual boom-bust cycle of the industry. But oil is still in short supply, and very few of the large oil companies have been able to hold oil production over the last few years—even as they were investing massively in oil exploration and production. Now, they are actually reducing investment in upstream projects, even in the face of historically high oil prices and falling production.  
If the major oil companies are cutting back on investments for exploration and production, they won’t be doing as much exploring and producing. Such a concept! High prices are needed to explore, extract, and produce the resource now increasingly relied upon to meet our energy needs. That’s great if you’re the oil industry. If you’re a consumer paying those high prices at the expense of other household and family needs, that’s not so good.

When consumers cut back, prices have to drop. That’s basic economics. When decreasing oil industry revenues cannot keep up with the increasing exploration and production costs of unconventional resources such as deep-water and shale fields, investments decline. Lower investments and thus lower supply from resources harder to find, extract, and produce to begin with means that we’re confronted with some legitimate supply and demand issues most fifth-graders would understand: Less supply and higher demand = a problem.

Not exactly rocket science….

So when we have less energy available to us and to the countless other companies and services we rely upon every hour of every day, and they have less of a supply to work with, how difficult is it to figure out which way the dominoes fall? Facts suck, but they will prove to be all the more troublesome if we aren’t taking steps now to deal with them!

Few of us outside the industry will notice the impact of those realities—and our ongoing failure to plan—right now. But in the not-too-distant future, when supply is critical and we’re all waking to the realization that all the companies were required to do in the intervening years to maintain adequate supply, what happens then when critical supply is not there? What rational adult among us thinks that we can just figure something out in a few days and continue merrily along?

Without high prices, oil companies cannot justify the much higher costs needed to sustain this recent oil boom from unconventional plays such as shale and the tar sands. With high prices come decreased demand from consumers unable to justify spending more money for fuel at the expense of food, clothing, shelter….But that’s not the end of it.

What happens to our commercial and cultural lifestyles when the reality portion of the no-energy-supply-worries tale comes into play? Production from conventional supplies has not increased since the middle of the last decade—misleading arguments about higher production totals notwithstanding (the simplest explanation: it’s not the same stuff being produced, and doesn’t have the same usefulness or angry efficiency as good old conventional crude).  

No one likes that part of the story, but our children will thank us if we start engaging in more realistic and fact-based discussions about what to do. Starting soon would be an ideal strategy.

Here’s reality, stripped of niceties. Oil is the lifeblood of industrial society, since nearly all transport fuel is oil-based and transport is essential to trade. Industrial nations have no ready and adequate substitute for petroleum. Therefore, unless preparations are made, the inevitable decline in global conventional petroleum production will gradually strangle the world economy, starting with the most oil-dependent nations.
It’s not all that difficult to connect the dots if one is willing to take a moment or two to consider the substance (such as it is) of the story peddled by those few with a vested interest in maintaining cash flow to their companies … the rest of us be damned.

(Adapted from some recent blog posts of mine)


Top Comments Submission Made Easy
EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Oil is not a resource in the sense that it is not (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    northsylvania

    something that can be used again and again because the reproduction cycle is short enough for humans to benefit.
    Oil is really nothing more than an energy storage system whose generational time-span is very long. We know we can capture the same energy quicker and store it with other systems, as the conversion of algae into fuel is demonstrating. We can even capture the energy directly with windmills and solar collectors.
    The only impediment we face in the U.S. is not a shortage of money, but an addiction on the part of our industrial and business sectors on monopoly situations and conditions, which we artificially create via legislative action. It's true that the monopoly creation is helped by a Congress that rations and distributes funds to enhance their own importance and power. But, that need not be the case. We can elect legislators with a more liberal attitude towards spending in the interest of innovation, rather than to secure their position at the top of the totem pole.

    Obamacare at your fingertips: 1-800-318-2596; TTY: 1-855-889-4325

    by hannah on Tue Jan 28, 2014 at 03:27:47 AM PST

    •  Your comment: Oil is not a resource in the sense.. (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      freerad

      You raise valid points which get too little attention from the media and from elected officials. The transition to the storage options you mention won't be quick or easy, but the longer we avoid having these important discussions, the greater the challenges will be in the years ahead

  •  According to the EIA website (0+ / 0-)

    THE US consumes about 19 million bpd of all petroleum products of which 9 million bpd, or 46% is gasoline (2010 numbers). Diesel for transport makes up the remainder with truck haulage being the heaviest user, despite rail transport's greater efficiency.
    The fleet average for cars is 22 mpg, not much better than in the days of the Model A. More fuel efficiency, more conservative driving, and less wasted trips could cut that usage down considerably. As far as transport goes, using rail and ships for a greater proportion of haulage and trucks for the minimum,  along with greater use of intermodal transport hubs could produce similar savings there.
    Along with using a mix of nuclear and renewables to produce electricity, and encouraging home and business owners to make their buildings as energy efficient as possible, we could cut our petroleum usage in half.
    We would still use oil for some things like jet fuel, but it would certainly last a lot longer.

    "The 'Middle' is a crowded place - that is where the effective power is - the extreme right and left might annoy governments, but the middle terrifies them." Johnny Linehan

    by northsylvania on Tue Jan 28, 2014 at 04:24:01 AM PST

    •  Your comment on options available (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      northsylvania

      No question that the strategies you discuss are both valid options and necessary. Like most such considerations, they compete with an entrenched and very well-financed enterprise which is in no hurry to transition away from fossil fuel usage.

      No one suggests the transitions or additional efficiency options are quick, easy, or fool-proof, but they'll be even less so the longer we wait to start having important discussions and making plans

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site